Talk:Ba'ku llama

uncredited earth llamas
do we really need to say that? is it not obvious to everyone that all the animals in Star Trek are either puppets, CGI, modells, or played by earth animals?-- Rom Ulan Hail 16:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It's intended to be tongue-in-cheek humor. ;) -- Renegade54 17:26, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

-_- i know, but still, was not very funny.well, I'll leave it. :P some people seems to like it ;P-- Rom Ulan Hail 17:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * To take this far too seriously for a moment... most of the animals seen in Trek are actually credited. The Llamas were not. :) -- Sulfur 17:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Errr... okay...  to take this a little too far further...  or whatever...  if they were never credited as Llamas, should we be calling them Llamas?  Not only do we not usually entertain assumptions on MA...  but it would be unreasonable to assume these animals have any similarities, other then superficial, with the Earth Llama.  Are we allowing this under the guise of Hodgkin's Law of Parallel Planetary Development?  Not that I really give a darn about an alien llama article...  but I'd have rather seen them titled "Ba'ku pack animal", or "Ba'ku beast of burden".  Again...  I realize how entirely too seriously I sound here...  so...  yeah...  please understand that my tongue is firmly planted in my oral cavity.  :P --  Hossrex 22:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)