Template talk:Peerreview

This is a little too decentralized because there's no way to check what's under review the way most people do with FA nominations. We need a peer review page, and if necessary, we can always do like Wikipedia with the subpages on that page for the full critique of each article. Otherwise, instead of the community's opinion, you only hear from the people who are already involved with the project. --Schrei 20:56, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)


 * There's Category:Memory Alpha peer review (which admittedly still needs some work) to list all current peer reviews and Memory Alpha:Peer review linking to it. I already thought about a page combining all those maintenance pages (this, PNA, stubs, etc.)... -- Cid Highwind 21:03, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Uhm, I tried to add this to the Ferengi talk page and it showed up in preview but not in save...thoughts? Logan 5 21:08, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)


 * I can see it. Try to reload that page, perhaps? -- Cid Highwind


 * Irritating. I'm on a different machine now and still not seeing it.  Any ideas? Logan 5 02:15, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Shouldn't peer review be filed under "pages needing attention"? i.e. it should be something like. That way, we can organise such articles along with pages needing attention. --Oshah 21:49, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)


 * Wouldn't it make more sense to put this on the actual page being discussed rather than it's talk page? In the case of Ferengi, I had no idea that a peer review was started for it until I read the talk page (which I rare do while looking for such info). --Alan del Beccio 13:02, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)