Talk:Abdullah bin al-Hussein

King v Prince
It's not redundant. He is the King. Back then he was only the crown prince. That's different. --9er 05:44, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh, sorry. Well, the double parentheses were redudant and I'll reword the other part to say at the time, because the way it was formed did sound redundant. Moo Cow 05:46, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

That works. --9er 05:48, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Picture as king?
Would it be appropriate for the article to have an image of King Abdullah as he looks today, perhaps performing some royal function? I know that for actors we sometimes have images of them "out of character", but I wouldn't want to go too far afield from Star Trek relevance. —Josiah Rowe 13:21, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Not really. The two Trek images that we have are sufficient. Leave the royal function images to Wikipedia. -- sulfur 13:28, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed. We currently have the two types of Star Trek-related actor images; him appearing in character and him out of character but on the set. I think that's enough. --Defiant 14:10, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks — that's why I asked. —Josiah Rowe 16:56, August 27, 2010 (UTC)