Talk:Eta

Should this exist?
I'm not convinced that this should exist in the form it does now. It is certainly not a disambiguation page by any stretch (1 item does not a disambiguation need), and the page tells us nothing at all. It was previously deleted in a very similar form as per this discussion. Thoughts? -- sulfur (talk) 15:30, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know... and I was part of that discussion. :) Back then, there wasn't even one canon reference, so it definitely shouldn't have existed. Now... you're right, as is, it's not a disambig with only one entry. I was planning on adding several other links, but I wasn't sure how best to do it... or if I even should. There are a number of non-canon references, from st.com, for example, or various reference books we cite in background info. Do a search on eta and see what pops up... and then let me know what you think. -- Renegade54 (talk) 18:09, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Since the Greek alphabet pages are more than just simple disambiguation pages, I don't see a reason to delete this again since there is now a canon reference. Also, was the page restored or recreated from scratch? Just asking because the history looks like it was restored, but the edit summary suggest otherwise. - 23:41, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

It was recreated, and I restored the old revisions for reference. And the fact is... a recreation wouldn't be much different regardless. -- sulfur (talk) 05:20, September 8, 2012 (UTC)