Memory Alpha:Pages for deletion/Sheilds

This is a page to discuss the suggestion to delete "". In all cases, please make sure to read and understand the deletion policy before editing this page.
 * If you are suggesting a page for deletion, add your initial rationale to the section "Deletion rationale".
 * If you want to discuss this suggestion, add comments to the section "Discussion".
 * If a consensus has been reached, an administrator will explain the final decision in the section "Admin resolution".

Deletion rationale
Well, aside from the atrocious spelling (see "shields"), it is uncited and contains information of references found in other articles. Really see no reason to merge this. --Alan 02:46, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Delete.– Cleanse 02:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, perhaps a speedy delete, given the situation.--31dot 02:50, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Doesn't qualify. --Alan 02:52, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It doesn't qualify under the Patent Nonsense provision? Either way, I don't think this needs to be discussed for more than a few days.--31dot 03:01, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Obviously, but also, from your provided link: "One should not confuse patent nonsense with: Very poorly written articles. Poorly written articles may need a lot of work to bring them up to Memory Alpha's standards, but they are not patent nonsense." --Alan 03:09, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- Renegade54 13:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. – Tom 14:01, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Err-or! Errrrrrrr-or! Sterlize! Sterrrrrriiillllllllliiiizzzzzzze! (Delete) --From Andoria with Love 04:25, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete beautiful message there Shran, but I agree.--UESPA 20:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Obviously a delete under our current policy. However, I do think we should re-open the issue of redirecting common-misspellings; I'll open a forum on it in Ten Forward. --- Jaz 23:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Admin resolution

 * Deleted as per consensus. I'm not totally convinced that it needs to be a common misspelling redirect, but I've added it in anyhow for the moment. -- Sulfur 12:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * In my mind a "common misspelling" is a valid alternative, not a sloppy crapshoot that no effort was made to check spelling, especially seeing as horrible spelling was rampant throughout the "write up". --Alan 15:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Sloppy, yes. But ultimately putting these kind of redirects in place can ease the browsing experience, and prevent these sort of issues from emerging. --- Jaz 06:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC)