Talk:Lilliputian

candidate for deletion?
In my opinion this article should redirect to Gulliver's Travels as it doesn't accomplish much on its own. Although the latter has two references that don't expressly reference Lilliputians it'd still be a good catchall. Witnesses for the defence: Romeo and Juliet individually linking to a joined article. Anyone agree? --Archer4real 16:18, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose. It stands well enough on its own.  Romeo and Juliet were always referred to together.  Lilliputians and Gulliver's Travels were not. -- sulfur 16:53, February 20, 2011 (UTC)

Utter rot. The Juliet reference in Darmok doesn't expressly mention Romeo, and the (somewhat vague) Romeo reference in The Schizoid Man has no reference to Juliet. --Archer4real 18:44, August 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * Oppose. There are specific references to "Lilliputian".  There are also specific references to Romeo and Juliet together, as well as the play.  If you think Juliet should have her own article based on a reference to just her, then the argument can be made on the R&J talk page(I don't necessarily agree).--31dot 18:53, August 2, 2011 (UTC)