Template talk:Constitution class starships

Intrepid is was listed as Constitution-class at MA
Regarding Cobra's recent revert, please see Ship's commissioned; this was the support for my inclusion of Intrepid on the template. I agree that Intrepid's class is uncertain, but so are other ships in that article and on this template. I'm only looking for consensus and consistency at MA. --GNDN 02:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * That consistency has been in the mists of being updated as of late. Unless a ship was seen or stated as being a certain class, it is not included "officially" as part of that class, and only "unofficially" if production information (ie Star Trek Encyclopedia, etc) suggests it might be. At that time I updated most all the templates recently to include only vessels specifically referenced as belong to said class (while also nominating several other templates for deletion). As I recall, I updated this template as well to reflect canon. --Alan del Beccio 03:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

How do we know that Yorktown was a Constitution-class vessel? --GNDN 03:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmmm... I thought the fact that the Yorktown bridge was the same as the bridge of the Enterprise was proof enough. No? Oh well...--Tim Thomason 05:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Not to be a stick in the mud, but what is the source on that claim? --OuroborosCobra talk 05:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Mostly visual based on the panels behind Randolph (and this too quickly read article). It was supposed to be a slightly amusing statement, but it came out more snippy than I intended.--Tim Thomason 05:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC)