User talk:Shlomi of Vulcan

Hi and welcome to Memory Alpha. I noticed that you recently edited the article Pavel Chekov. Unfortunately, your additions to that article seem to be non-canon - Memory Alpha only accepts facts from the six series and ten movies. Thus, I will revert your edits to that article but hope that you will keep contributing. -- Cid Highwind 15:27, 10 Dec 2004 (CET)


 * Cid, you contacted me regarding my contribution concerning Pavel Chekov and said it was removed because it did not follow canon. I suppose it depends on what is considered canon. If canon is only the 5 series and 10 motion pictures then I did not follow canon because we know nothing of Chekov after 2293 aboard Captain Harriman's Enterprise. However, a series of accepted Star Trek novels entitled "The Lost Era" do tell us about some of the events in the Commander's life following the presumed death of Captain Kirk. Also in the Star Trek writings of William Shatner (who is about as offical as they come) Chekov is briefly mentioned on different occassions as having taught at Starfleet Academy for several years, worked in SI, being promoted to Admiral and died holding the honorary and distinquished Title of Commandant Starfleet. Now all the dates I gave after 2298 are presumed and his type of death is also presumed. Star Trek has always relied on the creative imaginations of its loyal fans to continue the saga and fill in the gaps. In the case of Pavel Chekov that is precisely what I have done without altering Star Trek's time-honored philosophy or established canon and premise. I hope, therefore, based on the above information you will reconsider and put back my contribution to the life of Commandant Chekov. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. -- Shlomi of Vulcan 0920. 10 Dec 2004 (CST)
 * (Retrieved from User_talk:Cid_Highwind)


 * The purpose of this website is to collect and present all "canon" data of the Star Trek universe (you can read more about that here: and  policies). Fan fiction of any kind, even if it doesn't contradict established canon at the moment, should not be included. -- Cid Highwind 18:45, 11 Dec 2004 (CET)