Forum:A slight change to the stylesheet

I suggest we make the visited links a lighter shade of blue (and make the unvisitied ones slightly darker if need be, but not too much). The dark blue visited links have always bugged me. I've heard a couple other people mention this before. Opinions? --Vedek Dukat Talk 19:04, 5 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't mind either way. --Bp 01:53, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Personally, I'm a fan of the dark for visited, and light for unseen. But that's just my impression of things.  If it changes to the other way around, it'll take a while to get used to, but those of us used to dark for visited, light elsewise will get used to it. -- Sulfur 02:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Well dark for visited is fine if it was a little less dark is what I'm saying. ;) --Vedek Dukat Talk 05:21, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm not opposed to some color changes, but I see problems in this specific case with either both colors becoming too similar to each other, or the lighter one becoming too similar to the white of the surrounding text. I also haven't seen anyone else mention that before... Perhaps you could experiment with those colors using you personal stylesheet, either as a permanent fix or to suggest a different working set of colors? -- Cid Highwind 12:35, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm with the Vedek on this one. The dark is kinda hard on the eyes. Jaz  talk |undefined 04:08, 8 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The following colors are defined at the moment. Copy and modify the below list to suggest other colors:
 * Standard
 * Visited
 * New
 * External/Interwiki
 * Stub
 * -- Cid Highwind 14:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I have New in my monobook, because it is much better to see for me on the dark background. (Also forced it on "#p-cactions .new a".) MA/de's span.diffchange is also set to yellow and underline, so that changed punctation can be seen. -- Kobi 15:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)