File talk:Paramount logo.jpg

CBS/Paramount/SFM Images

 * File:Cbs color50s.jpg
 * File:CBS Paramount Television logo.jpg
 * File:CBSeye.png
 * File:CBS Paramount Television Logo.jpg
 * File:Dreamworks.jpg
 * New Additions - January 27, 2006
 * File:SFM Productions.jpg
 * File:SFM (2).jpg
 * File:SFM That's Dumb!.jpg
 * File:SFM Entertainment.jpg
 * File:SFM 10.jpg
 * File:The Best of SFM.jpg


 * Uneeded image with no relation to Trek. - Adm. Enzo Aquarius 21:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Added 4 more images uploaded by same user with no relation to Trek. 2 of which are duplicates. - Adm. Enzo Aquarius 23:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete all except one of the Paramount Television logos, which could be used on the CBS Paramount Television page if it survives the VFD process. -- SmokeDetector47( TALK ) 23:39, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with the SmokeDetector. Delete but keep one of the Paramount images. --From Andoria with Love 23:49, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * New Addition - Added unrelated-to-Trek SFM images. - Adm. Enzo Aquarius 17:15, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * + two more. Delete all of the SFM images; and I agree that we should keep at least one of the Paramount Pictures images.  —   THOR  =/\= 17:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me, keep one Paramount image. - Adm. Enzo Aquarius 17:52, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * keep File:CBS Paramount Television logo.jpg, delete the rest -- those companies never made Star Trek productions! (CBS Paramount, while not having produced any Trek, owns rights to Trek, therefore is valid. none of the others can claim this) -- Captain Mike K. Barteltalk 18:12, 27 January 2006 (UTC)


 * All of the above SFM images qualify for an immediate delete, in my opinion, especially since the person who updated it has now been blocked. --From Andoria with Love 20:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Ack! I deleted everything after this guy was branded a 'vandal', not having realized that one of the logos was spotted for keeping. I did upload File:Paramount logo.jpg in attempt to make amends, and Im sure that we can rather easily find another image to replace the one Mike pointed out. (Sorry!) --Alan del Beccio 03:20, 28 January 2006 (UTC)