Talk:T-Negative

This article is all wrong. We already have an article for the T-negative blood type. If you look at the "what links here" you will see that it refers to an early Star Trek fan publication called "T-Negative". --Alan del Beccio 01:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

all wrong, hmm? Why was it in the "wanted articles" section? --Babaganoosh 05:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Because it's supposed to be. As Alan said, the article is wrong because it describes something it's not supposed to descibe – namely, this. In actuality, it's supposed to cover a Trek fan magazine called "T-Negative". --From Andoria with Love 05:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Because we apparently wanted an articles on the early Star Trek fan publication, as Alan just said. By "all wrong", Alan is not saying that the creation of an article with this title is wrong, he is saying that the entirety of the contents is wrong, which it is. Don't feel bad, I got confused by the title as well. If you check the edit history of this article, you will note that I helped you with the creation. --OuroborosCobra talk 05:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * thank you for that. I misunderstood. How about T-Negative (fanzine)?--Babaganoosh 05:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * No worries, I've merged your page into t-negative and rewritten this article to reflect the fanzine. Dunno if it's entirely correct, though. But there's no real need for the qualifier, although a disambiguation is necessary. --From Andoria with Love 05:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)