File talk:T'Pol naked.jpg

You know, the ironic part is that, despite all of the controversy surrounding this shot...this is a body double, not Jolene Blalock. --130.64.137.195


 * Care to cite this? --Alan 04:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)


 * in an august 2004 interview with stuff magazine, blalock indicated that she had not used a body double, however the text is no longer on their website... - Deevolution 05:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Aww c'mon, this image is a "Picture of the Day" image? I was about to delete it 'til I saw that. This thing serves no purpose. It relays no relevant information to the article. All it does is offend religious people and make non-religious people want to wank themselves. Guess which kind of person I am. I vote for it to be gone. 24.168.233.100 10:55, 27 February 2008 (UTC))
 * Well, happy wanking then (-: Seriously, I don't see the problem with this image, so what she (Jolene Blalock or not) has her ass out *shock/horror*.  I agree that maybe it shouldn't be a "Picture of the Day", but if you're going to discuss the "controversy", adding an image allows visitors to decide whether they view it as controversial or not.  --The Doctor 13:21, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * We've had this discussion before. It was kept. We're not prudes here and we (well, most of us) are mature enough to handle a naked backside. And by the way... what were you about to delete? Only administrators can delete things, images included. --From Andoria with Love 10:25, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure it really deserves to be a "picture of the day"...which I think the IP was getting at. --Alan 13:08, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ahh. Well, as far as it not deserving to be a "picture of the day"... I'd have to agree. --From Andoria with Love 16:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC)