Talk:2255

there is a note here after a piece of information that states that "this could also have been 2254 -- shouldn't the info be moved to 2250s then? -- Captain M.K.B. 14:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Absolutely - I'd do it right now, but I'm not sure about the best wording - is this event really restricted to either 2254 or 2255, or could it take place in other years before or after as well? -- Cid Highwind 14:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC)