Memory Alpha:Pages for deletion/Magnetic conduit

This is a page to discuss the suggestion to delete "". In all cases, please make sure to read and understand the deletion policy before editing this page.
 * If you are suggesting a page for deletion, add your initial rationale to the section "Deletion rationale".
 * If you want to discuss this suggestion, add comments to the section "Discussion".
 * If a consensus has been reached, an administrator will explain the final decision in the section "Admin resolution".

Deletion rationale
This page has had a on it since July 2005! While there are several links to it, I found one to be piped back the term warp transfer conduit. As far as usage, I can find no references to this term [although I did find a reference to isoplasma conduit ], unless it appeared on a display somewhere, or some technical manual. --Alan del Beccio 09:46, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

2nd nomination
It's BAAACK!Capt Christopher Donovan 11:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Delete, if no citation has been found in two years. I can't recall that exact term being used.  Maybe a redirect if anything close to it was said. 31dot 14:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete.Let the article's creator find episode references and then repost the article. Though I doubt that will happen now if is has not for the last two years. – Watching...listening... 21:25, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps Keep. I do remember the term and think it was used in an episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation but I am not sure in which episode. Perhaps we'll have to write this article again when anyone will find a source. – Tom 12:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Probably Delete. I agree with Eyes Only.  I don't remember any usage of the term, and without citations for more then 2 years is just too long.  If someone can help, find a citation, and repost.  Hossrex 21:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's had a chance to be cited. – Cleanse 08:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

2nd discussion
It might be a good idea to make sure no one stumbles over any redlinks this time - for example by redirecting this to some article about a relevant warp enginge component (or Warp engine directly). -- Cid Highwind 12:03, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree. REDIRECT to "Power transfer conduit" or better yet, "Plasma conduit"Capt Christopher Donovan 12:40, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Plasma conduit. It can always be changed if this is found to be inaccurate.--31dot 14:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Honestly, there isn't even a reason to have both "Power transfer conduit" AND "Plasma conduit". They're the same thing, just different vernacular.  I've been toying with the idea of coming up with a "merged" article to present for consideration...we DEFINITELY don't need THREE articles about the same thing though, even if we keep two.Capt Christopher Donovan 00:38, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Admin resolution

 * Deleted. If we find a good reference to it, it can be easily undeleted. -- Sulfur 20:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

2nd resolution

 * Redirected to Plasma conduit. -- Sulfur 14:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)