Template talk:Review

This is the second time I see this, so let me just ask - what is the purpose of review on an image description page? Its content is:


 * Excerpts of copyrighted sources are included for review purposes only, without any intention of infringement.

What "excerpt" is used on an image description page? Why is that template supposed to be necessary in addition to the image fairuse template? If it is necessary for whatever reasons, shouldn't the fairuse template be edited instead of adding two templates? -- Cid Highwind 14:00, 13 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't see why not. I added it because someone else has, as it occurs on several image cover pages. I believe the intent was to replace the comment "For review purposes only" that others had been adding at the end of the caption. --Alan del Beccio 14:11, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

The "for review purposes" note should probably be a part of the image fairuse template anyway, because review purposes basically are what allows fair use in the first place. I'm removing the additional review with a bot now, and see what to do about the fairuse message later. -- Cid Highwind 15:57, 21 February 2006 (UTC)