Talk:USS Ticonderoga (NCC-87270)

If we have no other (canon) USS Ticonderoga, do we really need the 2364 disambiguation? -- Renegade54 (talk) 16:41, July 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * I know we had a USS Ticonderoga in Star Trek: Insurrection (scene was cut, but the ship was mentioned in the Star Trek Expanded Encyclopedia on page 672). I was unaware of the USS Ticonderoga in Conspiracy.  Is this from an on-screen graphic? --TardisCaptain (talk) 03:43, August 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree that the disambiguation is unnecessary. Just have a bg note here that the ship was to make an appearance in Insurrection, and treat it as as far as we know the same ship. -- Capricorn (talk) 09:49, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, it was from a display screen in "Conspiracy". I think the Ticonderoga in Insurrection was NCC-75227, though. -- Renegade54 (talk) 13:05, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Was that number ever confirmed though? I thought it was only speculation based on the registry of the craft Data was flying. -- Capricorn (talk) 04:11, August 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's speculation. I included a background note about this ship being mentioned in the movie "Insurrection". I have also included a note about this ship having the highest NCC number. I changed the registry to NCC designation because I can imagine some people arguing that other ships had higher registries, ex. USS Relativity or the Surak. I did the same for the USS Heart of Gold. "Conspiracy" has given us quite a range in numbers, hasn't it?:)Throwback (talk) 07:58, August 4, 2012 (UTC)