File talk:Mugato.jpg

Composite image
I don't think we should start uploading composite images, such as the recent version of this one. The quality is better than the image before, true, but can we please stick to single images? If there's need for a second image in the article, we should use a second image file instead of combining everything into one... -- Cid Highwind 14:08, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I didn't think this would be a problem. The previous image was just a Mugato headshot and didn't illustrate the creature well. A human headshot implies a human body, but someone unfamiliar to TOS wouldn't have been able to guess what the rest of this creature really looked like. Unfortunately, I couldn't find one single screenshot that gave a complete, in-focus look at the Mugato, and thought this was a simpler solution than three seperate pics to describe the same creature. The original file is still up; as an admin, you can revert it, and I'll try for a better second pic, if you like. --Aurelius Kirk 18:02, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

It's not really "a problem", it's just the question if we really want to use composite images for such a purpose. If two or three images are really necessary to illustrate something, we simply could upload and link three different image files. On the other hand, if we have one composite image, we can't use it in any case that just needs one of the "sub-images"... -- Cid Highwind 17:01, 19 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I see your point. I'll work on finding the best one or two images I can find. --Aurelius Kirk 06:07, 22 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree with Cid here, although you're also right, Kirk, it is a very good picture! We really do need a single picture of the beast for the site.  Zsingaya  Talk 07:32, 22 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I've uploaded the best compromise shot I could manage. These guys don't stand still long enough for perfectly framed, focused caps. But I wonder if I looked hard enough, could a zipper become canon? ;) --Aurelius Kirk 11:38, 22 February 2006 (UTC)