Talk:D4 class

Move
I think this should be moved to D4 class. The ship in was never given this designation in canon, whereas this one was. - Mitchz95 (talk) 02:16, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm willing to support because it feels inappropriate to link these at the top of Vorok's battle cruiser. --Alientraveller (talk) 18:33, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * Any links that currently use the redirect would have to be updated before this is moved. - 00:04, June 14, 2013 (UTC)


 * I would like to see the prime universe D4 class model information have a page of its own at "D4 class", a real world point of view article and not as it is now as a segment in the "Vorok's battle cruiser" article. Since it is a distinct design of its own, even though it never appeared in canon. I don't have a problem with this page staying here and having the name "D4 class (alternate reality)". --Pseudohuman (talk) 00:14, June 14, 2013 (UTC)

I don't think there's enough information about the concept D4 to warrant an article; keeping that info under Vorok's battle cruiser, or maybe under Studio models (ENT) is sufficient. Especially because, despite coming first, it didn't appear in canon. Now, what happened to those "what links here" options on article pages? I can't find them anywhere. - Mitchz95 (talk) 00:22, June 14, 2013 (UTC)


 * You don't think everything under "studio model" is enough text for an article? really? --Pseudohuman (talk) 01:48, June 14, 2013 (UTC)


 * Category:Unreferenced material Pseudohuman? - 02:14, June 14, 2013 (UTC)


 * If there is more background information to add for any of the other starships or movie special effects then this certainly can have an article of it's own.--Spock78 (talk) 06:01, June 15, 2013 (UTC)

Okay, so let's move this to D4 class and the info on the ENT studio model to D4 class (concept), or something like that. - Mitchz95 (talk) 16:53, June 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * Agree with rename. I think that the non-canon concept D4 article might be overkill unless more info is available. A footnote about it on the renamed page should suffice. -- Darth Duranium (talk) 07:15, June 16, 2013 (UTC)


 * "D4 class (concept)" article for that and renaming this to "D4 class" would be okay in my opinion. --Pseudohuman (talk) 07:28, June 16, 2013 (UTC)