Memory Alpha:Pages for deletion/Sir

This is a page to discuss the suggestion to delete "". In all cases, please make sure to read and understand the deletion policy before editing this page.
 * If you are suggesting a page for deletion, add your initial rationale to the section "Deletion rationale".
 * If you want to discuss this suggestion, add comments to the section "Discussion".
 * If a consensus has been reached, an administrator will explain the final decision in the section "Admin resolution".

Deletion rationale
Per the discussion on the talk page, I have put this up for deletion. The term is already referenced on Nautical terms, and the article is nothing more than a dictionary definition.--31dot 22:04, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Discussion
Well, if the term is already described on another page, and it's an article we don't want to pop up every once in a while - it would make sense to not delete but simply make it a redirect to the mentioned existing description page. -- Cid Highwind 22:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Nautical terms or military parlance? While at the former, I suspect/suggest that latter....--Alan 22:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree that military parlance is probably a better place for it than nautical terms. A redirect is a good idea since(as you said) it will prevent it from being recreated as an article.--31dot 22:51, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, military parlance sounds like a better place for that information... -- Cid Highwind 23:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Admin resolution
'''Merged with military parlance. --From Andoria with Love 09:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)