Talk:Science

Maybe "see also: Scientist" is not needed because it is linked in the first paragraph. --Bp 05:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strictly speaking, it isn't, for the reason you cited. I debated whether I should put it there or not, just for that reason. I ended up including it to enhance information flow: if you're reading down the list, and reach the bottom, the Scientist article is a natural follow-on to the information listed. A link is also appropriate, though, in the body at the top. That was my train of thought, anyway. :) -- Renegade54 10:49, 15 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I've been wondering if some of the info I added to the end of Scientists shouldn't be moved to the Science page - or otherwise combined. I originally added these materials because scientists (obviously) work or study at these places and win these awards, but maybe they belong under the science rubric? --Jim 14:05, 15 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I brought up a similar issue at Talk:Miner. Jaf 14:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC)Jaf