Talk:Tactical analysis

Tactical Analysis = tactical analysis?
Why is it necessary to separate Tactical Analysis and tactical analysis? Seems like such a course/subject would be an academic discipline, studied by a tactician, on par with how one might take a course in Biochemistry at SFA, a subject about Biochemistry. --Alan del Beccio 19:40, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Because there is the scan which determines the number of weapons, the configuration, etc and then there is the SFA course which may or may not be similar. I kinda figure it is probably on tactical maneuvers (Picard, Riker, etc) and the weapons config on assorted ships, but that's a different topic for another time. --WTRiker 19:51, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I understand it is a scan, but there could be a whole science behind it for all we know. My thoughts are with regards to how we combine similarly named titles on similarly named subjects when it comes to ideas based on the same title and subject, like Biochemistry (a course and a science) or Stellar cartography (a department and a science). Why separate them when they are the same topic, even if a slightly different application. --Alan del Beccio 20:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)