Talk:Riley

Might I suggest that this be made into a disambiguation page? We have:
 * Kevin Riley
 * Riley Shepard
 * Riley Frazier
 * Riley
 * Julie Riley
 * Bridgett Riley

Seem to be enough to warrant a disambig to me. --OuroborosCobra talk 19:55, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Maybe Riley (disambiguation), if one was necessary, seeing as this Riley is the only "natural" title that would occupy this name space. Otherwise, based on the definition of "Disambiguation" one wouldn't/shouldn't be necessary as the term is defined as "the process of resolving the _conflict that occurs_ when articles about two or more different topics have _the same natural title_. None of those titles are the same, just they share a common surname/given name. --Alan 20:22, 24 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Maybe what we really need is, at the top of this page,
 * You may be looking for another Riley
 * --TribbleFurSuit 20:31, 24 May 2008 (UTC)


 * That was kind of pointless. --Alan 20:40, 24 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't even know what you mean. Pointless, because the disambig page doesn't exist? Pointless, because it's against the rules to have one? Pointless, because you don't agree with Cobra that disambig is warranted? I don't even know what you're saying. --TribbleFurSuit 21:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Stating the obvious from what was already previously said. Also, as an aside, if you type in "Riley" in the search bar and click "search" you get the very same results as listed above . --Alan 22:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I think definitely create Riley (disambiguation). It could certainly help, and cannot hurt. "Riley" could indeed refer to any of the above individuals. – Cleanse 23:18, 24 May 2008 (UTC)