Talk:Terellian plague

Now, this article is linked to from mentioning the 'Terellian Plague'. Is that intended to be the Tarellian plague from ? Or is it a plague from the 4 armed Terellians? :)

Does someone have a script that they can check with, as I do not. -- Sulfur 03:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Further followup... from Talk:All Good Things... (episode), it seems that the spelling is incorrect, and should be Terrellian plague, which already exists. Changing this to a redirect and fixing the source. :) -- Sulfur 03:44, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually, both spellings are wrong for this reference. Here is the line from the script:
 * DATA: "Yes. There was an outbreak of Terrellian Plague on Romulus."
 * So, it is Terrellian Plague, not Terellian plague. I'll make the move, or you can. In addition, the article needs to be re-written, as it has nothing to do with "Haven". --OuroborosCobra talk |undefined  03:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Yah, we should prolly add the redirect as per script spelling. The current article is as per companion spelling, and is correct. So, to sum up: -- Sulfur 03:51, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Terellian plague redirects to Terrellian plague (All Good Things, as per companion)
 * Tarellian plague is from Haven and a different plague.
 * Terrelian plague is apparently the script spelling and will shortly be a redirect to Terrellian plague as that was the consensus arrived at previously on Talk:All Good Things... (episode)
 * I have to disagree, I don't see much of a discussion, or a consensus there. I don't know why we would select the companion over the script, it makes no sense to me. --OuroborosCobra  talk |undefined  04:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

It struck me that there was something akin to a consensus (read: no disagreement with the current naming system at the least), and that also more people will have read the companion than the script. So either we redirect one way or t'other and fix all of the relevant links and conversation. Regardless, without other input, I think that we should leave it the way that it is for the time being. -- Sulfur 04:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)