Talk:Roman

PNA-incomplete this article is still missing specific content from.

Regarding the protection, most of these anonymous edits seen in the history page are counterproductive -- and seeing the same changes with an explaination found here is getting old. The page is clearly marked as incomplete, it doesn't help any when points of information are constantly removed.

If garum is a so-called "dead link", then write the article about garum at garum (as I eventually have) rather than defining it on this page. The food is culturally linked to the Romans, of both Earth and 892-IV hence why it is placed on the page in the first place. By the way, Garum was not the name of someone who lived on 892-IV, that is completely inaccurate. --Alan del Beccio 16:25, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)


 * This article should be protected from itself - it is absolute crap written by someone that can't take any constructive criticism. -


 * Care to clarify? Or is it just easier to be an anonymous poster who can't support his own arguments, but finds it much easier to sling mud? --Alan del Beccio 01:40, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)