Memory Alpha:Pages for deletion/Bismarck Class

This is a page to discuss the suggestion to delete "". In all cases, please make sure to read and understand the deletion policy before editing this page.
 * If you are suggesting a page for deletion, add your initial rationale to the section "Deletion rationale".
 * If you want to discuss this suggestion, add comments to the section "Discussion".
 * If a consensus has been reached, an admin will explain the final decision in the section "Admin resolution".

Deletion rationale
Made up fanon. --OuroborosCobra talk 02:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Discussion
Captain Chase would disagree, but it may be too early to create an article. -- StAkAr Karnak 02:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, of course that is technically made-up fanon until the studio accepts it. ;) --Bp 03:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I knew something like this would happen. Delete. --From Andoria with Love 07:38, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Admin resolution
Deleted since it's not yet canon. --From Andoria with Love 01:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

explain
We have an article about the not yet green lit show about the new animated webisode. But we cant have a page about the class of ship used in said show? it should be a stub if we know nothing other then its name and that its considered old in the series. but it shouldn't be deleted. this talk for deletion shows up in google... if anybody cares --76.25.117.97 01:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * No...but it could be mentioned on said not-yet-green-lit-show's article page, if it isn't already. --Alan 01:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It is mentioned.--31dot 01:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * OMGZ0RZ GET IT OFFA TEH GOOGLE! By the way, 76.25.117.97, a similar discussion went on here if you care for a much larger explanation. The article about the animated series is a realworld one, the article about the Bismarck would be an in-universe one - except it's not in-universe yet. --TribbleFurSuit 02:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Well that certainly made things much more complicated than they originally were. --Alan 06:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC)