Talk:Vocal subprocessor

Maybe it's just me, but I'm pretty sure it's spelled Vocal subprocessor. Can somebody check this, cause if so this should be moved to Vocal subprocessor. -AJHalliwell 03:38, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * A Q&D search on Google revealed that, other than Memory Alpha (MA), there were two sites talking about "vocal subprocesser" and that 20 wrote "vocal subprocessor". Amongst the 20 were some encyklopedias such as [www.startrekcrossindex.com Startrekcrossindex] and [thecia.com.au/star-trek/technology-v.shtml The "Star trek" canon concordance: Technology]. I therefore vote on the latter spelling. StarTrek.com didn't have a clue, as I could see.--Peter R 04:51, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Come to think of it, I think Tuvok may have said something about a "Sub-vocal processor". And thanks for looking it up!-AJHalliwell 05:02, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)