Talk:Murphy (Enterprise)

While we don't Murphy's rank, should I put crewman? Witness for the defence: Lewis (Voyager) (another Lewis!) who get the same treatment. Also I don't know if the categories I've added are in the 'proper' order on reflection.--Archer4real (talk) 18:41, April 11, 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't think "crewman" means a rank in the context of that article, just that he was a member of the crew. If their rank wasn't stated, we shouldn't give one. 31dot (talk) 18:44, April 11, 2013 (UTC)

We don't even know 'he' was a he! Hesitant to try to rejig order of categories in case it goes wrong. Is it worth mentioning that Murphy led a split engineering team to accelerate Farallon's work?--Archer4real (talk) 12:52, April 12, 2013 (UTC)


 * Pardon my sexism; no problem with mentioning the relevance to Farralon's work. 31dot (talk) 19:31, April 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about the order of categories. -- sulfur (talk) 19:42, April 12, 2013 (UTC)