Talk:Alsia

Merge
I suggested one, 'cause there's only one member of this species and there's no need to have a page separate from Alsia. Plus there's no info besides this. --Golden Monkey 15:15, 7 November 2008 (UTC)


 * This has been suggested before, with other un-named species with only one known individual. It's been rejected before too, on the basis that if some species exists, it gets an article, and if some character exists, he gets an article too. --TribbleFurSuit 17:15, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, the pages for the species and individuals have been merged sometimes; Emi's species, Fallit Kot's species, and others have been merged. So I assumed that either those should be split up again OR the others should be merged too. See discussion there...--Golden Monkey 22:08, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I was going to say that with the majority of these, they get merged and the "X species" articles turn to categorized redirects. It's just a matter of catching up with what has been created since the merging first started. --Alan 22:12, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not so much that this species only has one individual, or even that the species lacks a name, but that there is virtually no information about it other than "It's a species". I believe that's why the other similar articles have been merged(that's why I've supported those actions, anyway)--31dot 04:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)