Talk:1900

I'm not really a big fan of what is written in the background. I thought this was a star trek universe timeline, not a series timeline. And for that matter, why 1900? --Gvsualan 21:12, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree. Even for a background section, this information seems a little too arbitrary. There's no relevant connection between the year 1900 and the information given. -- Cid Highwind 22:59, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Like i said in my summary field -- i was just trying something that would apply to every year in the timeline, since it is unlikely there is going to ever be any content to add to 1900, and various other years in the timeline. I'd agree there isn't much cause to try and drag a relation into the year artificially. The notes should be removed. -- Captain Mike K. Barteltalk 01:24, 27 May 2005 (UTC)