Talk:Chris Blackwood

Suggestion for deletion
To reiterate what I said on the talk page (in other words, I'm copying & pasting because I'm too lazy to write something new): "Since there are only two Chris Blackwoods listed, shouldn't a disambig at the top of each Blackwood page suffice? I was under the impression that disambig pages should have at least three links, but if there were only two pages, we would just stick with disambigs at the top of those pages. So... is this disambig necessary?" --From Andoria with Love 04:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Deletion rationale:


 * Discussion:
 * Delete . But which actor should get the natural title? I'd say CB(stuntman) because he seems more "notable", but then again CB(actor) actually "played" someone as an extra. Regardless, the other article can keep it's disambiguation notice, and we can leave a note on both pages.– Cleanse 10:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete .--31dot 23:21, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply to Cleanse: Crap, I didn't think about that. Um... in that case, maybe it's best to keep this page. If not, though, then I think the stuntman should get it since he did more for Trek than the extra. --From Andoria with Love 04:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, as Alan pointed out to me on IRC, "we are rationalizing a decision based on arbitrary choices...seeing as both require a qualifier, there should be a disambiguation page" (ala ). So, if those who have already voted will agree I would like to withdraw my nomination. --From Andoria with Love 05:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't really think is a good example seeing that there's 3 people there. :-) But if in similar situations with 2 people we still have a disambig, we should keep the disambig here. Consistency is what's important. – Cleanse 05:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'll go with that. --31dot 20:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep for above reasons.Hossrex 09:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Article kept. – Cleanse 07:18, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Admin resolution: